posted 07/20/09 06:25 PM | updated 07/22/09 04:36 PM

State gives Nickelsville 72 hours to get out, after Seattle threatens fines (updated)

People find a dry place to have breakfast at a state DOT lot where they've set up Nickelsville. (Photo: Elliot Stoller/indymedia)

 

The state's transportation department has given Nickelsville – the homeless encampment set up as a protest against its belief Seattle is not doing enough to house them – until 7 p.m. Thursday to move, after Seattle threatened them with fines.

According to a notice posted at the encampment on a vacant South Seattle lot owned by the state Department of Transportation, the homeless residents have 72 hours to clear out their personal belongings.

Earlier on Monday, the city's Department of Planning and Development posted its own notice threatening to fine the state $150 a day for 10 days and $500 a day thereafter for allowing an illegal encampment.

Bruce Deavers, one of Nickelsville’s residents, said Monday evening a representative from the state said the encampment's beef was with the city and said the 72-hour time limit allowed the homeless to open a dialogue with the city.

Alex Fryer, a spokesman for Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels, said the state could petition the city for a permit, thus throwing the ball back into the state's court.

Deaver said he didn't know what the residents would do. Nickelsville has contacted property owners looking for a permanent place to go. "Maybe someone will come forward in the next 72 hours," he said Monday night as the rest of the encampment lined up for hotdogs in the dusty lot.

"We have nowhere else to go," he said. "Where do they want us? Back on the streets?"

The residents of Nickelsville had originally been given a July 6 deadline to move from the spot on vacant state Department of Transportation land near the Duwamish River.

However, Gov. Christine Gregoire granted the encampment an extension until Monday to find a different location.

Deavers, though, said the notice came from the city and said the residents had to have other plans ready. The encampment has been forced to switch sites seven other times since it began last September, he said. He and other residents are in no mood to leave.

In an article on Nickelsville last month in the PostGlobe, Ron Judd, an advisor to Gregoire, said the South Seattle lot was funded by the gas tax, and the state’s 18th amendment requires the money be used for highway purposes. “So the issue we face," he said, "is that we can’t just do anything (with the DOT property).”

But in the same article, Deavers said the homeless people at the encampment enforce a long list of rules and feel safer there than on the streets or in shelters. “You don’t have to worry about setting your bag down and getting in line to buy something and having somebody steal everything you own,” he said.

Save and Share this article
What might "highway purposes be"?
This just shows how lacking in creativity is the State Department of Transportation. All that would have to be done, is enlist those living at Nickelsville as people who would, with the able assist of Washington State Patrol, clean up roadways. Then, the letter and the spirit of the law is met; and more importantly, these people have a safe place to stay.

But methinks that there is more here than meets the eye. Likely, the mayor's pal, the governor, has conspired to do his bidding and, yet again, move these people, who title for their encampment, must infuriate the mayor - especially in this, an election year.
Comment by Terry Parkhurst
8 months ago
( 0 votes)
What "highway purpose" is the site used for now?
I wonder what "highway purpose" the land fills when it lies vacant.

I am really tired of the City of Seattle denying there is a problem with homelessness and sweeping away encampments. If the City cannot afford to offer shelter to people living on the streets then at least get out of the way so they can help each other.
Comment by nwcitizen
8 months ago
( +1 votes)
hypocrisy
I also wonder which developer in the neighborhood.doesn't want that part of Seattle in their back yard. The mayor is too busy telling them all to walk and pedal more to their downtown jobs to work on the affordable housing issue.
Comment by CentralAreaGuy
7 months ago
( 0 votes)
hypocrisy
I also wonder which developer in the neighborhood.doesn't want that part of Seattle in their back yard. The mayor is too busy telling them all to walk and pedal more to their downtown jobs to work on the affordable housing issue.
Comment by CentralAreaGuy
7 months ago
( 0 votes)
Why not move it to W Seattle?
Say the Admiral District (home of Nickels aka Shamu and Tim "the Shark" Ceis)?
Comment by tacoman
7 months ago
( 0 votes)
solidarity
It is certainly a shame how our city and state governments use each other as scapegoats while batting these people back and forth like a mouse between a cat's two paws.

Given the problem of homelessness in modern cities, how can our representatives continue to take the initiative to strike out at residents who are helping themselves through hard times?

I live in an area of Seattle where homeless people and drug addicts use the bushes on my street to get high--cars are broken into, other crimes are committed on my street. Still, our government spends time picking on the homeless who are not living in my bushes, but those who are organizing into camps and work parties. Why attack those who are attempting to better their situation?

If the powers that be continue to attack these citizens whereever they attempt to find shelter on vacant land, we must not continue to watch them bowled over. Eventually, they will run out of energy to run, to flee to another site. We, the people, must stand in solidarity with them. We must go to the camp and in an act of civil disobedience (if it comes to this) allow ourselves to be arrested with them.

We must create a popular outcry at this shame. Our newspapers have informed us, now we have to act.
Comment by anon
7 months ago
( +1 votes)
RE: solidarity
The answer to this is unfortunately simple: Scapegoating. When the homeless are drunk or stoned it is "their" fault when they are not it is "our" fault. Therefore any homeless who are law abiding responsible and trying must be made into criminals and deviants.
Comment by CentralAreaGuy
7 months ago
( 0 votes)
adult behavior
The bickering between the SDOT (the mayor's shield) and the governor resembles fighting of children sitting in the back seat of a car. "He touched me!" "Did not."

All this juvenile behavior goes on while the residents of Nickelsville model adult behavior.
They appear consistently orderly, and reasonable, ... calm and cool in the face of extreme circumstances. They have, in fact, taken citizenship to a higher level of responsibility, and have employed extra-legal actions where the law and lawmakers have failed for years to provide for the legal circumstances that would permit the exercise of their human rights to shelter and dignity. Just think. They have removed themselves from the streets, a remarkable service to society. This contrast should concern politicians as we the voters see the camp residents as the hands-down takers of the high road.

The long-run losers are obviously the politicians. With this growing, public understanding, the elite business interests will soon have less electoral value than the voter consensus... maybe it does already. Scales change direction. Your choice, incumbents.
Comment by Carol Isaac
7 months ago
( 0 votes)
Add Your Comment
Name:
Email:
(will not be displayed)
Subject:
Comment: